About This Page: This is a discussion on vBulletin Modder Is Now Running Xcache. within the News and Announcements forums, part of the Site Business category, at vBulletin Modification Discussions. I dumped eAccelerator tonight and installed Xcache instead. I must say it seems much nicer. Please let me know if you find the pages loading differently. They seem snapier to me. I think this will fix the problem of white |
01-02-2007, 11:44 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,194
|
vBulletin Modder Is Now Running Xcache.
I dumped eAccelerator tonight and installed Xcache instead. I must say it seems much nicer. Please let me know if you find the pages loading differently. They seem snapier to me. I think this will fix the problem of white pages we have been getting.
|
|
|
01-03-2007, 01:03 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 37
|
Seems to be much faster now CM. Nice work as always.
|
|
|
01-09-2007, 06:33 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6
|
Much faster here as well, good choice.
|
|
|
01-21-2007, 07:55 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Subscriber
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18
|
Pardon my ignorance on eAccellerator and Xcache technologies.
But is Xcache running for the entire site, including your very top level index page, or just your forum pages?
I'm at work, and my terminal only has Mozilla 1.2.1 and IE 6 installed.
Your site doesn't seem to be showing properly in Mozilla 1.2.1, as the entire page was shifted up, and I couldn't see the top portion of each page at all.
This includes your top level index page, and your forum registration pages.
Anyway, IE 6 seems unaffected.
|
|
|
01-21-2007, 08:04 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,194
|
That has nothing to do with any server side caching and optimizer. That's is just a matter of a decrepid old browser that has been long ago replaced by Firefox. Just click that little icon on the right side column and get your FF at work. 
|
|
|
01-21-2007, 08:08 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Subscriber
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18
|
OIC. 
Thanks for that, Code Monkey.
I wanted to run FireFox at work many months ago, but I'm simply not given an Administrator privilege for my terminal, that's all.
Oh, well, back to the less preferred IE for now, I guess. 
|
|
|
01-21-2007, 11:35 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: France
Posts: 458
|
I know that feeling all to well at work, we are still using the IE6 early version, no extra's so if there is flash or any other fancy code... nothing... blank .. frustrating...
And if you go to the info tech's office, none is running IE... they all agree there is much better but rules say that safety blablablabla yeah except for them as usual 
|
|
|
01-21-2007, 11:55 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Subscriber
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18
|
Talking about Flash, they had version 7 plug-in installed in Mozilla and no plug-in at all in IE.
I've just installed Syrus XL Media's Xeon MP3 Player, and signed up for Google Analytics yesterday.
I can't test MP3 player, or view Analytics reports at work at all, because of this.
Oh, well, it's not like I should be doing my own stuff at work, should I? 
|
|
|
01-21-2007, 01:22 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: France
Posts: 458
|
sshhhh, boss might be around the corner  mine is to far away so I'm pretty cool 
|
|
|
01-23-2007, 03:29 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 14
|
Can you guys explain the benefits of xcache? Running vBSEO, I am always interested in anything that would be an improvement to my current configuration. Hearing your opinion of the benefits over eaccelerator would be great.
|
|
|
01-23-2007, 07:14 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,194
|
The benefit over eacelerator is that it is actively developed. Ea dev has really slowed to a crawl and I have given up. Too many errors and such. The nice thing about xCache is that you can tell it how many proccesors you have. Say you asign 60 MB to cache and you have 4 processors. Then it will create 4 15 MB cache's and asign one to each processor.
|
|
|
01-23-2007, 07:43 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 475
|
So where do you get this thing, how much, and how do you install it?
|
|
|
01-23-2007, 07:51 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,194
|
You need to have your own server or a VPS.
|
|
|
01-23-2007, 07:53 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 475
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Code Monkey
You need to have your own server or a VPS.
|
Doh!!!
You KNOW where my site is being hosted!!! LOL
Its probably in the same room as yours!!! 
|
|
|
01-23-2007, 08:01 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,194
|
Oh, yeah, I forgot. lol
You could send an email to support and ask them if they could install xcache on your VPS.
|
|
|
01-24-2007, 07:45 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 14
|
Interesting. I might have eaccerlerator removed from my server and have xcache installed in it's place.
Does it seem to be faster for you? or just less errors?
I have been experiencing occasional page hang ups and wonder if this might be my issue. My server is currently overkill compared to what I actually need, so I know it isn't a load issue.
|
|
|
01-24-2007, 08:02 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,194
|
We were getting white pages like crazy. Keep in mind that I try to keep PHP and mysql on the latest release versions. xcache seems to be keeping up with that unlike eA. I commend the eA guys for trying to keep TurkMMCache alive but they seem to have too many other priorities.
If I remember right though, Ioncube running as a php.ini load needs to be first in php.ini.
|
|
|
01-24-2007, 08:03 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,194
|
Oh, sorry, yes, it does seem to be faster. And it is reported that the heavier your site is the faster it is. Like I said, If I had more memory I would use more and it would cache everything.
|
|
|
02-02-2007, 10:03 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 475
|
Just had this installed. After Seppuku is running like a champ, but Foto Fanatix is down for the count!!
Have also noticed that although After Seppuku is running fine the server loads are huge.
Last edited by G_Man : 02-02-2007 at 10:14 PM.
|
|
|
02-02-2007, 10:30 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,194
|
I haven't had those issues. Did they install the optimizer?
|
|
|
02-02-2007, 10:51 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 475
|
Seems that xcache doesn't play well with Zend Optimizer that I am using with my Gallery. John uninstalled xcache and my forums are both running fine again.
|
|
|
02-02-2007, 11:24 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,194
| |